Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!
Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #276385 |
@DonielF possible, though I worry about crossovers. On MY I once asked a question (and was shouted down until I deleted it) that I *thought* was general and turned out to be specific to Conservative. Another time I asked a question based on Conservative experience and found out everyone does that. ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276364 |
@AA double voting might be more of a nuisance, but I think the other issue I raised there is more important. It feels a little odd for votes from *outside* the current community to overwhelm ones from *within* it. (This was a problem on SE with migrations, too.) We do preserve the imported votes i... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276407 |
I'd say go ahead and ship that and if the community comes up with a revised version, we can add it in. (Heck, I'll even do it if you like to save you the extra work. :-) ) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276364 |
@DonielF Jin's beautiful logo is owned by Stack Exchange. The status of tag wikis is unclear to me. We can definitely import questions and answers (from main and meta), and people can copy their own work without anybody's special permission. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276412 |
I would like to bring my existing non-bad content too. I re-asked a couple questions that were unanswered there, just to test the waters here a bit, but I wouldn't want to do a lot of that. And that only covers a small portion of my questions and none of my answers. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276364 |
@IsaacMoses we're using CommonMark, one of the many dialects of Markdown. We have some [formatting help](https://judaism.codidact.com/help/formatting). (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276364 |
@dfilreis under the terms of the Creative Commons license we can import any questions and answers we like, so long as we attribute and link them. I'll edit the question to explain. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276364 |
@rosends I don't think we want link-only answers here, so we should either import it or quote and cite it the same way we would for any other source that an answer uses. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276409 |
I'm not familiar with this practice. Is the first in place of opening the hand at פּותֵחַ אֶת יָדֶךָ, or in addition? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276362 |
@Aliza the plan for search is that you search in the current category by default and can check off a "search all categories" box. We don't have that yet. Currently search is global and each result shows which category it's from. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276362 |
@msh210 categories and post types are orthogonal. We can create a Purim Torah category that supports both Q&A and articles. (The "create post" page has a selector for post type in that case.) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276385 |
[This answer on the proposal that led to this site](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276280#answer-276291) proposes a broader scope and has strong support. We'll need to work this out on our meta now that we have one. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276383 |
This is a question not a proposal, so I interpret upvotes to mean "this is a good question" and not "we should include this in our scope" (and I would not interpret downvotes as "we should not include"). To express opinions on the scope question, please write answers. :-) (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276379 |
I agree with Isaac. I'm imagining search rewriting the search query to expand children, so if you search on [a] [b] and [b] has children [c] and [d], the actual search would be [a] [b] [c] [d]. When considering adding a tag to the list via hierarchy expansion, if it's already there we stop process... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276379 |
Oh good point; loops could happen and we'd want to handle or prevent that. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276371 |
@Dani hmm, looks like it should have. Did this one ping you? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276373 |
I asked this on Mi Yodeya and didn't get an answer, though I got a comment that led to a partial answer, which I've added here. I would still welcome a fuller answer. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276372 |
Reposting my unanswered question from Mi Yodeya. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276371 |
To create the tag for the question I just asked I went to the post where I could use the Hebrew keyboard, constructed the tag name I wanted, and then cut/pasted it into the tags field. That's a little hacky, and it means I didn't get benefit of matching on tag names, so it might lead to tag clutter ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next →