Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

How do I look up commentaries on general patterns in torah as opposed to specific verses?

+2
−0

This is a research-methods question with a concrete example. I'm interested in the answer to the concrete example, but what I really want to know is: how could I look this up myself?

There are sometimes widespread patterns in torah. For example, I know about the reversing vav, which flips a verb from perfect to imperfect or vice versa. I know this happens all over torah, and I know the torah uses the "regular" perfect and imperfect verb forms in many places. When the torah uses one of these approaches consistently in a section, that doesn't seem particularly remarkable. But I came across a case where both forms are used in the same passage: in Bereishit 22:20-24 the torah uses both יָלְדָה and וַתֵּלֶד. The commentaries I found there don't talk about this, but if this is the Nth occurrence of that sort of thing, why would they? All I can tell from the absence of commentary is that there's apparently nothing special specifically about contrasting Milkah and R'umah. But that doesn't get me any closer to my answer.

If I had a question about specific words, I could use a concordance to find the first occurrence and look there. If the words were uncommon enough, I could even look up all the occurrences. But, short of reading from the beginning, I don't know how to find the first occurrence of both of these verb forms in close proximity. And maybe I'm thinking about it all wrong; maybe I shouldn't be looking for commentary anchored to a specific passage when it's something widespread, but should instead be checking somewhere else. But where?

How do I learn how to learn -- how to find commentaries about "meta" issues when I come across an instance?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Morphologically annotated texts (2 comments)
Unfortunately, I can say i have only run into two scernarios: the first is when the commentator makes... (1 comment)

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »