Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Why is this counting not a mitzvah?

+2
−0

We are required to count the omer because the pasuk states וּסְפַרְתֶּם לָכֶם

so Mitzvah #127 here mandates that counting.

There is also an obligation (#221 on the list) to count the years towards Shmita as it is written וְסָפַרְתָּ֣ לְךָ֗ (pasuk here)

But for some reason, when counting towards purity (as a zav) (15:13), the pasuk reads וְסָפַר לוֹ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים לְטָהֳרָתוֹ

that injunction does not turn into a listed mitzvah!

Why would the other two countings be a mitzvah but this counting, called forth by similar text, is not a mitzvah.

Why not?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Many Rishonim give reasons why a blessing is not said by women monthly when counting clean days (eg. she may bleed again and break the count (Tosafot Menachot 65b) or because nowadays we only keep clean days because of doubts how to correctly count Nidda vs Zava (Raavyah 526)) which only apply to the blessing but seem to assume the count itself is/was still actually a mitzva. Sefer Aguda even quotes Ri explicitly that women should count orally. Those that don't include it in their list of 613 commandments may have included it in the general mitzva of זב/זבה or as a detail in the commandment to immerse in the mikva.

Radvaz (Responsum #1102) says in this case, since one could choose to remain impure, the verse can't be referring to an obligation and we must thus understand it refers to general calculation without all the details of counting the Omer.

Another option is that וספרתם לכם by Omer doesn't alone imply oral counting, and it's only from the repetition תספרו חמשים יום and/or שבעה שבועות תספר לך that we derive the additional oral obligation (see for example Netziv). Accordingly, "counting" clean days remains a calculation alone.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »