Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

How did people understand references to 2 destructions before the first destruction?

+1
−0

Note -- I know that this is not a fully formed question yet so I welcome any edits.

There are "prophecies" and references which we understand to be about the destruction of the two temples and the building of a third beit hamikdash. How were references like this understood during the time of the first temple?

If the Gemara in Megilla explains that Yosef wept (In Bereishit 45) on Binyamin's neck בָּכָה עַל שְׁנֵי מִקְדָּשִׁים שֶׁעֲתִידִין לִהְיוֹת בְּחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל בִּנְיָמִין וַעֲתִידִין לֵיחָרֵב

regarding the TWO temples that would be destroyed in Binyomin's territory

how was that pasuk explained while the first temple stood? Even if there was prophecy that that temple would be destroyed (and this is where the question needs help, identifying which of the nevi'im was testifying about the loss of the FIRST temple as opposed to the second) was there a public understanding that the second temple would be temporary because it was destined to be destroyed?

I sense that there are more references I could cite -- the question would be the same: how were they understood before the 1st temple was destroyed (or at least before the 2nd was built)? Is the application to two destroyed temples a post-second destruction innovation or was there any awareness of the "need" (expectation) for 3 temples even initially? (similarly, references to a number of exiles or kingdoms -- were they understood earlier in the process?)

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »

Like any library, this site offers tons of great information, but does not offer personalized, professional advice, and does not take the place of seeking such advice from your rabbi.

This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look!

You can also join us in chat!

Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!

Like what we're doing? Support us! Donate