Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!
Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.
Post History
This d'var torah discusses kal vachomer arguments in torah: Rashi is bothered that these two arguments have some sort of flaw. He wants us to realize that this isn’t so difficult, as there are t...
Question
rashi
#3: Post edited
by
msh210
·
2020-12-18T14:18:35Z (over 3 years ago)
make the title match the revised question
What are the ten flawed kal vachomer arguments in the torah?
- What are the flaws in the ten kal vachomer arguments in the torah?
This [d'var torah](https://judaism.codidact.com/posts/279882) discusses *kal vachomer* arguments in torah: > Rashi is bothered that these two arguments have some sort of flaw. He wants us to realize that this isn’t so difficult, as there are ten instances of kal vachomers in the Torah that have a flaw. He is stressing that despite this flaw, there is indeed some resolution to the argument. I hadn't previously heard that there were, specifically, ten flawed *kal vachomer* arguments in torah, at least according to Rashi. As noted in the linked post, two (with their flaws) are: - The brothers arguing for their innocence in the matter of Yosef's stolen goblet: the *kal vachomer* is: why would they come all this way and then steal? But this doesn't apply to *all* of the brothers. - Moshe arguing that if even the Israelites won't listen to him, surely Paro won't. But the people didn't listen to Moshe because they were exhausted from their labors, not because of Moshe specifically, and this wouldn't apply to Paro. Bereishit Rabbah 92:7 lists the other eight *kal vachomers* that Rashi refers to. What are their flaws? Or am I misunderstanding Rashi and he's not saying there are problems with the other eight? > 3.(Numbers 12) "And G-d said to Moses, 'If her father would spit in her face [she would hide from sight for seven days] surely then if the Shekhina rebukes her [she should hide for] fourteen days!"; 4. (Deuteronomy 31) "Indeed while I still live among you, you were rebellious, how much more so after my my death!"; 5. (Jeremiah 12) "If you race with the foot-runners and they exhaust you, surely then, you cannot compete with horses!"; 6. (ibid) "If you are secure only in a tranquil land, you will surely not fare well in the jungle of the Jordan!"; 7. (Samuel I 23) "Behold we are afraid even here in Judah, surely [we will fear them] if we go to Keilah!"; 8. (Proverbs 11) "If the righteous pay [for sin] while on earth, certainly the wicked should expect to!"; 9. (Esther 9) "And the king said to Esther, 'In the capitol city the [Jews destroyed so many] imagine what they have done in my other provinces!" [NOTE: The tenth a fortiori argument seems to be: 10. (Ezekiel 15:5) "If the wood of a grapevine has little use when it is whole, it obviously has no value when it is charred!"]
#2: Post edited
by
Monica Cellio
·
2020-12-18T03:48:33Z (over 3 years ago)
Revised per comments. The list itself is easily found, but what the other flaws are still eludes me.
This [d'var torah](https://judaism.codidact.com/posts/279882) discusses *kal vachomer* arguments in the torah:- > Rashi is bothered that these two arguments have some sort of flaw. He wants us to realize that this isn’t so difficult, as there are ten instances of kal vachomers in the Torah that have a flaw. He is stressing that despite this flaw, there is indeed some resolution to the argument.
I hadn't previously heard that there were, specifically, ten flawed *kal vachomer* arguments in torah, at least according to Rashi. As noted in the linked post, two are:- the brothers arguing for their innocence in the matter of Yosef's stolen goblet- Moshe arguing that if even the Israelites won't listen to him, surely Paro won'tWhat are the other eight?
- This [d'var torah](https://judaism.codidact.com/posts/279882) discusses *kal vachomer* arguments in torah:
- > Rashi is bothered that these two arguments have some sort of flaw. He wants us to realize that this isn’t so difficult, as there are ten instances of kal vachomers in the Torah that have a flaw. He is stressing that despite this flaw, there is indeed some resolution to the argument.
- I hadn't previously heard that there were, specifically, ten flawed *kal vachomer* arguments in torah, at least according to Rashi. As noted in the linked post, two (with their flaws) are:
- - The brothers arguing for their innocence in the matter of Yosef's stolen goblet: the *kal vachomer* is: why would they come all this way and then steal? But this doesn't apply to *all* of the brothers.
- - Moshe arguing that if even the Israelites won't listen to him, surely Paro won't. But the people didn't listen to Moshe because they were exhausted from their labors, not because of Moshe specifically, and this wouldn't apply to Paro.
- Bereishit Rabbah 92:7 lists the other eight *kal vachomers* that Rashi refers to. What are their flaws? Or am I misunderstanding Rashi and he's not saying there are problems with the other eight?
- > 3.(Numbers 12) "And G-d said to Moses, 'If her father would spit in her face [she would hide from sight for seven days] surely then if the Shekhina rebukes her [she should hide for] fourteen days!"; 4. (Deuteronomy 31) "Indeed while I still live among you, you were rebellious, how much more so after my my death!"; 5. (Jeremiah 12) "If you race with the foot-runners and they exhaust you, surely then, you cannot compete with horses!"; 6. (ibid) "If you are secure only in a tranquil land, you will surely not fare well in the jungle of the Jordan!"; 7. (Samuel I 23) "Behold we are afraid even here in Judah, surely [we will fear them] if we go to Keilah!"; 8. (Proverbs 11) "If the righteous pay [for sin] while on earth, certainly the wicked should expect to!"; 9. (Esther 9) "And the king said to Esther, 'In the capitol city the [Jews destroyed so many] imagine what they have done in my other provinces!" [NOTE: The tenth a fortiori argument seems to be: 10. (Ezekiel 15:5) "If the wood of a grapevine has little use when it is whole, it obviously has no value when it is charred!"]
#1: Initial revision
by
Monica Cellio
·
2020-12-17T04:24:20Z (over 3 years ago)
What are the ten flawed kal vachomer arguments in the torah?
This [d'var torah](https://judaism.codidact.com/posts/279882) discusses *kal vachomer* arguments in the torah: > Rashi is bothered that these two arguments have some sort of flaw. He wants us to realize that this isn’t so difficult, as there are ten instances of kal vachomers in the Torah that have a flaw. He is stressing that despite this flaw, there is indeed some resolution to the argument. I hadn't previously heard that there were, specifically, ten flawed *kal vachomer* arguments in torah, at least according to Rashi. As noted in the linked post, two are: - the brothers arguing for their innocence in the matter of Yosef's stolen goblet - Moshe arguing that if even the Israelites won't listen to him, surely Paro won't What are the other eight?