Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Who got to have the leftover flour from the Omer?

+0
−0

The Mishna reports in Menachot 10:4 that, after the required amount of premium flour had been extracted from the barley set aside for the Omer, the considerable amount tof leftover, mixed-quality flour would be "redeemed and edible by anyone." It seems to me that such flour, which had been processed in the Temple and had come very close to being part of a unique annual national offering, would be a treasured substance. So, I'm wondering who, in practice, got to have it.

According to the first opinion cited in the mishna, that the flour was property of the Temple (hekdesh)1, then redeemed so anyone could eat it, who redeemed it? Was there a Temple outlet store for such items? Was there a one-time auction?

According to R' Akiva, who disputes the first opinion and implies2 that only the flour extracted for the Omer was ever made hekdesh, am I correct in understanding that the rest would just be returned to whoever owned the field the barley had been harvested from? It seems a little surprising that that fortunate person gets to have used the Temple as his grain-processor, in effect.


1. As indicated by the fact that according to this opinion, the leftovers are exempt from Ma'aser, which must be because the original harvest process put all the barley straight into hekdesh. (See R' Bartenura.)
2. As indicated by the fact that according to R' Akiva, the leftovers require Ma'aser. (See R' Bartenura.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »