Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Comments on Why isn't Iyar 16 a fast day?

Post

Why isn't Iyar 16 a fast day?

+1
−0

There are fast days through the year which commemorate the process leading to the destruction of the temple. The way I learned them, there was a date marking the beginning of the siege, one for the breaching of the walls and one for the ultimate burning of the Beit Hamikdash.

I just read on chabad.org that today, the 16th of Iyar marks another day in the process

Romans Razed Jerusalem Wall (70):

In the year 70 CE (3830 from Creation), Titus and the Roman army laid siege upon Jerusalem, greatly weakening its defenders. On the 16th of Iyar, the Romans razed the middle wall of Jerusalem. The city was later burned, its inhabitants massacred, and the Temple destroyed on the 9th of Av.

Why would this not have been marked by a fast?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Because it only happened by the second Bais Hamikdash not the first, or both. The fats days are all f... (2 comments)
Because it only happened by the second Bais Hamikdash not the first, or both. The fats days are all f...
chatzkel‭ wrote over 1 year ago

Because it only happened by the second Bais Hamikdash not the first, or both. The fats days are all for the first or both, none are just for something that happened by the second when there were no longer Neviim who could institute it

rosends‭ wrote over 1 year ago

chatzkel‭ you bring up what sounds like a rule/policy, that nothing was instituted after the time of the Nevi'im. Is that true? Wouldn't there be a derobonon possibility?