Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Comments on Embarrassing someone in private

Post

Embarrassing someone in private

+1
−0

The gemara in Bava Metzia 59a make the statement that one should not "whiten his friend's face" (embarrass him).

The section states

ואל ילבין פני חבירו ברבים מנ"ל מדדרש רבא דדרש רבא מאי דכתיב (תהילים לה) ובצלעי שמחו ונאספו קרעו ולא דמו אמר דוד לפני הקב"ה רבש"ע גלוי וידוע לפניך שאם היו מקרעים בשרי לא היה דמי שותת לארץ ולא עוד אלא אפילו בשעה שעוסקין בנגעים ואהלות אומרים לי דוד הבא על אשת איש מיתתו במה ואני אומר להם מיתתו בחנק ויש לו חלק לעוה"ב אבל המלבין את פני חבירו ברבים אין לו חלק לעוה"ב

In both of these iterations the injunction against causing someone to blush, or go pale is specifically b'rabim, in public. The five times that the phrase appears all include this word. The appearances in Sotah and Sanhedrin, likewise, include "in public."* Would the same behavior and the same effect be acceptable in private? If the impact is tantamount to murder (as many seem to explain) is murder in private any more appropriate than in public?

Are there any commentaries which discuss the laws of such severe shaming in private as acceptable? Or why the law is given explicitly limited to the public sphere?

*not until the Abarbenel and some later commentators do I find המלבין פני חבירו without the public idea but there is no discussion I see that says that the case of private is different -- it just seems that this is how the text is quoted: partially.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Chofetz Chayim? (2 comments)
Chofetz Chayim?
Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 1 year ago

Have you already checked whether the Chofetz Chayim has anything to say on this? (I can't remember.)

rosends‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I have not looked -- I assume he would be against it but I don't know if he would analyze why the gemara spoke only in the public.