Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Comments on On Pharaoh's not knowing יקוק

Post

On Pharaoh's not knowing יקוק

+1
−0

Jacob and his sons, when speaking to Egyptians, consistently refer to God as ‏(ה)אלקים, "the god", and not by his name, יקוק, that distinguishes him from other supposed gods, or other names of his. (E.g., Genesis 39:9, 40:8, and 41:16–32 passim.)

(When speaking amongst themselves, although they usually use ‏(ה)אלקים, they occasionally use another name. E.g., Genesis 48:3, 49:18.)

Later, Moses and Aaron tell the pharaoh (not the same one as in Joseph's time) that יקוק had said to release the Jews. (Exodus 5:1.) The pharaoh replies (5:2):

Who is יקוק that I should listen to him? I don't know יקוק and won't release the Jews.

This sounds to me possibly like he's tying the two together: like, had he indeed recognized יקוק, he would released the Jews.

I wonder whether any commentators tie these facts to one another: that the pharaoh didn't know of יקוק because the Jews had never referred to him as such. I wonder, too, whether any go so far as to say that, had Jacob et al. used the name יקוק, the later pharaoh would've let the Jews out on demand.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

While this wasn’t the first place I’ve seen this, Rabbi Dovid Fohrman in his book _The Exodus You Alm... (2 comments)
While this wasn’t the first place I’ve seen this, Rabbi Dovid Fohrman in his book _The Exodus You Alm...
DonielF‭ wrote about 3 years ago

While this wasn’t the first place I’ve seen this, Rabbi Dovid Fohrman in his book The Exodus You Almost Passed Over addresses this point. As we know, the different Divine Names refer to different ways in which we perceive His relationship with us. Pharaoh was used to the אלקים-type impersonal relationship, and he was certainly aware of that Name (note his response to אלקי העבריים isn’t “He doesn’t exist,” but rather “you’re just lazy”). He denied יקוק, the personal relationship we have with Him.

manassehkatz‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Exactly. It wasn't a question of names/words, it was the meaning behind that he "didn't know" or more to the point "didn't believe".