Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!
Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.
Post History
At the beginning of Perek Chelek in Masechet Sanhedrin, the text specifies that "All Israel has a share in the world to come." But when the exceptions are presented, Bilam is included and he isn't ...
#2: Post edited
by
Monica Cellio
·
2024-07-29T17:39:26Z (5 months ago)
added link
At the beginning of Perek Chelek in Masechet Sanhedrin, the text specifies that "All Israel has a share in the world to come." But when the exceptions are presented, Bilam is included and he isn't from israel, so I would have no hava amina that he would merit the next world.- If the focus is on Jews, as per the first line fo the mishna, why move suddenly into non-Jew who weren't included in the original pronouncement?
- At the beginning of [Perek Chelek in Masechet Sanhedrin](https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.90a.15?lang=bi), the text specifies that "All Israel has a share in the world to come." But when the exceptions are presented, Bilam is included and he isn't from israel, so I would have no hava amina that he would merit the next world.
- If the focus is on Jews, as per the first line fo the mishna, why move suddenly into non-Jew who weren't included in the original pronouncement?
#1: Initial revision
by
rosends
·
2024-07-29T16:20:47Z (5 months ago)
Why move from discussing Jews to non-Jews
At the beginning of Perek Chelek in Masechet Sanhedrin, the text specifies that "All Israel has a share in the world to come." But when the exceptions are presented, Bilam is included and he isn't from israel, so I would have no hava amina that he would merit the next world. If the focus is on Jews, as per the first line fo the mishna, why move suddenly into non-Jew who weren't included in the original pronouncement?