Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Does a surrogate mother affect the Jewish status of the child?

+3
−0

The child of a Jewish woman is a Jew. Is this status transmitted through birth or through parentage (genetics)? Specifically, if a Jewish woman acts as a surrogate for two non-Jews, what is the status of the child?

A surrogate provides a womb for a fertilized egg from another couple. Non-Jewish friends of mine had a child this way recently; the child is genetically theirs, with no genetic contribution from the (also non-Jewish) woman who carried it to term for them. It made me wonder what would have happened if the surrogate had been Jewish.

I assume that a Jewish woman would be advised to not get into this situation, but that doesn't mean it never happened.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Great question! This has definitely been discussed in Jewish medical ethics sources. I think I even r... (2 comments)
I have to check but I thought that the majority opinion is that everything follows the biologically b... (1 comment)

1 answer

+4
−0

Some say the legal mother is the birth mother. Targum Yonatan says that Dinah, Jacob's daughter, was conceived in Rachel's womb, and Joseph in Leah’s womb, but that God switched the embryos so Rachel could give birth to a son, Joseph. [Targum Yonatan on Genesis 30:21] The justification is that in the Torah, all six times Leah has a son, it says: “Leah conceived and bore a son”. But when it comes to Dinah, it just says: “Leah bore a daughter”. [Gen. 29:32-35; 30:17-21] Yet, the Torah clearly refers to Leah as Dinah's mother [Gen. 34:1]. So we learn that she who gives birth is the mother, not she who produced the egg.

But the Talmud may imply that conception, not birth, determines the mother. It asks: If one takes a fetus from the womb of one animal, and places it in the womb of another animal, who is the mother? They discussed this because there are special laws for first-born animals. The Sages’ answer is Teku, which is equivalent to “We do not know”. [Ḥullin 70a] But Maimonides rules that the first animal is the mother if the transfer occurs after forty days from conception, implying that conception, not birth, defines the mother, at least after the first forty days. [Rambam, Mishneh Torah, Sefer Korbanot, Hilchot Bekhorot 4:18]

So far, most rabbinical authorities rule that the one giving birth is the mother. But the debate continues.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Rambam (3 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »