Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!
Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.
Post History
1. Where does the principle of halachic marriage annulment (afka'inhu) apply? There are five Talmudic cases where this principle is invoked: A man betrothed (eirusin) a minor (rabinically) and wa...
Answer
#1: Post edited
by
Monica Cellio
·
2020-09-01T01:50:49Z (over 4 years ago)
fixed import glitches (copied whole body)
<p><strong>1. Where does the principle of <em>halachic</em> marriage annulment (<em>afka'inhu</em>) apply?</strong></p><p>There are five Talmudic cases where this principle is invoked:</p><ol><li><p>A man betrothed (<em>eirusin</em>) a minor (rabinically) and was attempting to finalize the marriage (<em>nissuin</em>) once she reached majority. Before he did so, a second man seized her, and seemingly betrothed her on a biblical level. The second man's actions are invalid, because of <em>afka'inhu</em> (according to Rav Ashi). (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Yevamot.110a.6?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Yevamot 110a</a>)</p></li><li><p>If a man coerces a woman to accept his betrothal, we invoke the principle of <em>afka'inhu</em> (according to Mar bar Rav Ashi) and the betrothal does not take effect. (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Bava_Batra.48b.5?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Bava Batra 48b</a>)</p></li><li><p>A man divorces his wife on condition that he does not return, and he is prevented from returning unavoidably (<em>b'oneis</em>). Biblically, the divorce does not take effect, but the Rabbis applied <em>afka'inhu</em> to retroactively annul the marriage. (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Ketubot.3a.3?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ketubot 3a</a>)</p></li><li><p>A man sends an agent to divorce his wife, and then cancels the agency (under certain circumstances). Biblically, if the agent were to present his wife with the <em>get</em> she is not divorced, but the Rabbis applied <em>afka'inhu</em> to retroactively annul the marriage. (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Gittin.33a.9?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Gittin 33a</a>)</p></li><li><p>A man at death's door divorces his wife and then recovers. Biblically, she is not divorced, but (according to Rabbah and Rava) the Rabbis applied <em>afka'inhu</em> to retroactively annul the marriage. (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Gittin.73a.5?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Gittin 73a</a>)</p></li></ol><p>Can we apply it in other cases?</p><p>Rashba in <a href="http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1376&st=&pgnum=413" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Responsum 1185</a> writes that we cannot:</p><blockquote><p>×ין לך בכלל ×“×‘×¨×™× ×לו ××œ× ×ž×” שהתירו בהן בפירוש ש×× ×›×Ÿ ××£ ×× ×• × ×מר שכל שעשה ×©×œ× ×›×”×•×’×Ÿ בקידושיו ×œ× × ×™×—×•×© לקידושין</p><p>You only have in all these matters what they explicitly permitted. Otherwise, we could also say that in every case where one acts improperly in betrothal we can ignore it.</p></blockquote><p>Chacham Tzvi makes the same point in <a href="http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19566&st=&pgnum=199" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Responsum 124</a>, although he does note that Rivash in <a href="http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19989&st=&pgnum=264" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Responsum 399</a> thought that it may be possible for a community nowadays to legislate that any marriages performed against its own specific rules would be invalid.</p><p>(Parenthetically, the Rabbinical Assembly's Beit Din (Conservative Judaism) will annul marriages for reasons other than the Talmudic ones, normally in <em>agunah</em> cases where all other methods of resolution have failed - see e.g. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=vi9ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT239&lpg=PT239&dq=annulling%20marriage&source=bl&ots=RTxJUGyZFV&sig=gCf5n6CXH6Z-70a70OpMNM7Do94&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3-JjJ6vjdAhXMmOAKHTvPCJYQ6AEwBXoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=anuuling%20the%20marriage&f=false" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.)</p><p><strong>2. Does <em>afka'inhu</em> make them liable for the prohibitions involved in engaging in sex outside of marriage?</strong></p><p>This question is a little difficult to answer. There will certainly be no earthly consequences. Even <a href="http://www.hebrewbooks.org/rambam.aspx?sefer=4&hilchos=25&perek=2&halocha=17&hilite=" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rambam</a> who believes that there is a biblical prohibition couldn't prescribe any punishment here, as they were not 'warned' (<em>hatra'ah</em>) before the act.</p><p>Is G-d going to punish them? Presumably not, as they are now following Rabbinic legislation as they were <a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.17.11?lang=bi&aliyot=0" rel="nofollow noreferrer">commanded to</a>, but (not being privy to G-d's point-scoring system) I don't say this with any great confidence.</p><p><strong>3. What is the status of the children of an annulled marriage?</strong></p><p>The children have the status of any other child born from unmarried parents i.e. they are completely normal Jews. They are not <em>mamzerim</em>, who are only formed from the product of adulterous or incestuous unions (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.15.1?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 15:1</a>). If he is a <em>kohein</em>, she does not become a <em>zonah</em> (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.18.2?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 18:2</a>), and thus the children are not <em>challalim</em> (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.19.1?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 19:1</a>).</p><p><strong>4. Can <em>afka'inhu</em> revoke the status of a <em>mamzer</em>?</strong></p><p>In theory, it appears that applying <em>afka'inhu</em> would allow a <em>mamzer</em> to lose his stigma.</p><p>However, R. Tam held that if it is obvious that someone is doing something in order to activate <em>afka'inhu</em> and thus 'purify' a <em>mamzer</em>, then the Rabbis would not apply <em>afka'inhu</em> in such a case. If, however, it's clear to us that such is not his intent, then applying <em>afka'inhu</em> would indeed 'purify' the <em>mamzer</em>. (<a href="https://www.sefaria.org/Tosafot_on_Gittin.33a.9.2?lang=bi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Tosafot Gittin 33a s.v. <em>ve'afka'inhu</em></a>)</p>
- **1. Where does the principle of *halachic* marriage annulment (*afka'inhu*) apply?**
- There are five Talmudic cases where this principle is invoked:
- 1. A man betrothed (*eirusin*) a minor (rabinically) and was attempting to finalize the marriage (*nissuin*) once she reached majority. Before he did so, a second man seized her, and seemingly betrothed her on a biblical level. The second man's actions are invalid, because of *afka'inhu* (according to Rav Ashi). ([Yevamot 110a][1])
- 2. If a man coerces a woman to accept his betrothal, we invoke the principle of *afka'inhu* (according to Mar bar Rav Ashi) and the betrothal does not take effect. ([Bava Batra 48b][2])
- 3. A man divorces his wife on condition that he does not return, and he is prevented from returning unavoidably (*b'oneis*). Biblically, the divorce does not take effect, but the Rabbis applied *afka'inhu* to retroactively annul the marriage. ([Ketubot 3a][3])
- 4. A man sends an agent to divorce his wife, and then cancels the agency (under certain circumstances). Biblically, if the agent were to present his wife with the *get* she is not divorced, but the Rabbis applied *afka'inhu* to retroactively annul the marriage. ([Gittin 33a][4])
- 5. A man at death's door divorces his wife and then recovers. Biblically, she is not divorced, but (according to Rabbah and Rava) the Rabbis applied *afka'inhu* to retroactively annul the marriage. ([Gittin 73a][5])
- Can we apply it in other cases?
- Rashba in [Responsum 1185][6] writes that we cannot:
- > אין לך בכלל דברים אלו אלא מה שהתירו בהן בפירוש שאם כן אף אנו נאמר שכל שעשה שלא כהוגן בקידושיו לא ניחוש לקידושין
- >
- >You only have in all these matters what they explicitly permitted. Otherwise, we could also say that in every case where one acts improperly in betrothal we can ignore it.
- Chacham Tzvi makes the same point in [Responsum 124][7], although he does note that Rivash in [Responsum 399][8] thought that it may be possible for a community nowadays to legislate that any marriages performed against its own specific rules would be invalid.
- (Parenthetically, the Rabbinical Assembly's Beit Din (Conservative Judaism) will annul marriages for reasons other than the Talmudic ones, normally in *agunah* cases where all other methods of resolution have failed - see e.g. [here][9].)
- **2. Does *afka'inhu* make them liable for the prohibitions involved in engaging in sex outside of marriage?**
- This question is a little difficult to answer. There will certainly be no earthly consequences. Even [Rambam][10] who believes that there is a biblical prohibition couldn't prescribe any punishment here, as they were not 'warned' (*hatra'ah*) before the act.
- Is G-d going to punish them? Presumably not, as they are now following Rabbinic legislation as they were [commanded to][11], but (not being privy to G-d's point-scoring system) I don't say this with any great confidence.
- **3. What is the status of the children of an annulled marriage?**
- The children have the status of any other child born from unmarried parents i.e. they are completely normal Jews. They are not *mamzerim*, who are only formed from the product of adulterous or incestuous unions ([Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 15:1][12]). If he is a *kohein*, she does not become a *zonah* ([Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 18:2][13]), and thus the children are not *challalim* ([Rambam, Hilchot Issurei Bi'ah 19:1][14]).
- **4. Can *afka'inhu* revoke the status of a *mamzer*?**
- In theory, it appears that applying *afka'inhu* would allow a *mamzer* to lose his stigma.
- However, R. Tam held that if it is obvious that someone is doing something in order to activate *afka'inhu* and thus 'purify' a *mamzer*, then the Rabbis would not apply *afka'inhu* in such a case. If, however, it's clear to us that such is not his intent, then applying *afka'inhu* would indeed 'purify' the *mamzer*. ([Tosafot Gittin 33a s.v. *ve'afka'inhu*][15])
- [1]: https://www.sefaria.org/Yevamot.110a.6?lang=bi
- [2]: https://www.sefaria.org/Bava_Batra.48b.5?lang=bi
- [3]: https://www.sefaria.org/Ketubot.3a.3?lang=bi
- [4]: https://www.sefaria.org/Gittin.33a.9?lang=bi
- [5]: https://www.sefaria.org/Gittin.73a.5?lang=bi
- [6]: http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1376&st=&pgnum=413
- [7]: http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19566&st=&pgnum=199
- [8]: http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19989&st=&pgnum=264
- [9]: https://books.google.com/books?id=vi9ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT239&lpg=PT239&dq=annulling%20marriage&source=bl&ots=RTxJUGyZFV&sig=gCf5n6CXH6Z-70a70OpMNM7Do94&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3-JjJ6vjdAhXMmOAKHTvPCJYQ6AEwBXoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=anuuling%20the%20marriage&f=false
- [10]: http://www.hebrewbooks.org/rambam.aspx?sefer=4&hilchos=25&perek=2&halocha=17&hilite=
- [11]: https://www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.17.11?lang=bi&aliyot=0
- [12]: https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.15.1?lang=bi
- [13]: https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.18.2?lang=bi
- [14]: https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.19.1?lang=bi
- [15]: https://www.sefaria.org/Tosafot_on_Gittin.33a.9.2?lang=bi