Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Comments on Can anyone explain the heavenly voice in the oven of Akhnai?

Post

Can anyone explain the heavenly voice in the oven of Akhnai?

+1
−0

Starting at the beginning, since I don't read Hebrew, how accurate is the translation "Why are you differing with Rabbi Eliezer, as the halakha is in accordance with his opinion in every place that he expresses an opinion?"? There could be nuance in the Hebrew vital to understanding.

A point that I haven't seen addressed, though my studies have admittedly been limited, is that this was an unexpected thing for anyone to say. The heavenly voice did not just say the oven was not susceptible to ritual impurity. It said, according to that translation, that Rabbi Eliezer was always right in his legal opinions.

Even the most learned and brilliant of scholars is subject to human fallibility. Is there analysis anywhere of what it means that a heavenly voice said otherwise?

Is there an idea out there that the miracles and the voice were a test of the Sanhedrin's firmness in their analysis? If so, is it conceivable that a heavenly voice would exaggerate to probe the responses of the listeners?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

What is interesting to me is that the voice is speaking of a klal, a general rule of deciding a law, ... (4 comments)
What is interesting to me is that the voice is speaking of a klal, a general rule of deciding a law, ...
rosends‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

What is interesting to me is that the voice is speaking of a klal, a general rule of deciding a law, and yet this principle is not found on a list of such https://halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Klalei_HaTalmud#General

Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

Also, a much more oft-stated "rule" is that when Hillel and Shammai disagree Hillel is right, but there are (if I recall correctly) six counter-examples. Outside of this passage, I've never heard the claim made about Rabbi Eliezer, but if he were "always" right I would have expected to encounter that claim more often than the one about Hillel/Shammai. Granted I'm not an expert and what I say is anecdotal.

rosends‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

Monica Cellio‭ that's exactly what fascinates me. The bat kol doesn't say "R Eliezer is right" but invokes a (heretofore?) non-existent principle!

msh210‭ wrote over 1 year ago · edited over 1 year ago

It shouldn't be surprising that this rule isn't on a list of practical rules of decision: after all, it's not a practical rule. Rather, it's a rule of the divine voice, if you will, which is not accepted practically.