Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Judaism community on Codidact!

Will you help us build our community of learners? Drop into our study hall, ask questions, help others with answers to their questions, share a d'var torah if you're so inclined, invite your friends, and join us in building this community together. Not an ask-the-rabbi service, just people at all levels learning together.

Comments on How was Judaism shaped by anticipation of the destruction of the Temple?

Post

How was Judaism shaped by anticipation of the destruction of the Temple?

+2
−0

In a newspaper article by a Jewish academic about changing support for Zionism among US American Jews (deliberately not linked to avoid distracting from my actual question), I read

More than 2,000 years ago, when Jewish leaders knew the Jerusalem Temple would fall, they left it behind and constructed a new Jewish future. What they created is what we understand as Judaism.

I'm rather confused as to what he's talking about. 2000 years ago would be 45 years before the destruction of the second Temple. Were there really Jewish leaders preparing for a post-Temple Judaism two generations before Titus? Have I got the wrong Temple and he's talking about a pre-exilic setting? Neither option makes much sense to me. In both cases, I understood that the standard analysis is that major changes occurred after the disaster, not before, as people wrestled with the theological and practical implications.

Can anyone point me to an exposition of an understanding of the development of Judaism which makes sense of the claim?

History

2 comment threads

As an academic, the author should be reachable for clarification. (1 comment)
I would guess that this is fuzzy or bad math, as they didn't "leave it behind" before the destruction... (1 comment)
As an academic, the author should be reachable for clarification.
Fred Wamsley‭ wrote 11 months ago

As an academic, the author should be reachable for clarification.